[1] | Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. and Pérez Hernández, L. 2011. « The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor: Myths, Developments and Challenges." in Metaphor & Symbol, 26 : 161-185. |
[2] | Pérez Hernández, L. 2011. « Cognitive Tools for Successful Branding" in Applied Linguistics 32 (4) : 369-388. |
[3] | Pérez Hernández, L. and F.J. Ruiz de Mendoza. 2011. « A Lexical-Constructional Model Account of Illocution." in VIAL 8 : 99-138. |
[4] | Pérez Hernández, L. 2007. « High-level metonymies in the understanding of modality : a cross-linguistics analysis. », in Kosecki, Krzysztof (ed.). Perspectives on Metonymy. Munich : Peter Lang. pp. 133-147. |
[5] | Pérez Hernández, L. 2004. « Illocution and Metonymy » in Text Processing and Cognitive Technologies, 9 : 45-52. |
[6] | Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José & Lorena Pérez Hernández. 2004. "High-level modal metonymies in English and Spanish". Jezikoslovlje 4; Número especial: How Universal are Conceptual Metonymies?. Editores: Klaus-Uwe Panther y Linda L. Thornburg. Facultad de Educación de la Universidad J. Strossmayer, Osijek, Croacia; 103-120. |
[7] | Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F.J. y Pérez Hernández, L. 2003. Cognitive Operations and Pragmatic Implication. In Panther, K. y L. Thornburg (eds.), Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing, 23-51. Ámsterdam: John Benjamins. |
[8] | Pérez Hernández, L. y Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F.J 2001. Grounding, Semantic Motivation, and Conceptual Interaction in Indirect Directive Speech Acts Journal of Pragmatics, 34/3: 259-284. |
[9] | Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F.J y Pérez Hernández, L. 2001 Metonymy and the Grammar: Motivation, Constraints, and Interaction. Language and Communication 21.4: 321-357 |
[10] | Pérez Hernández, L. 2000. On Cognition and Speech Acts: Why Do We Need a Cognitive Model for the Performance of a Threat? PLUM Series (Papers in Linguistics of the University of Manchester), University of Manchester Press, 214-226. |
[11] | Pérez Hernández, L. 1996. The Cognition of Requests. Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense, 4: 189-208. |
[12] | Pérez Hernández, L 2009. « Análisis léxico-construccional de verbos de habla.", in Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 40 : 62-93. |
[13] | Pérez Hernández, L. y S. Peña Cervel. 2009. « Pragmatic and Cognitive Constraints on Lexical-Constructional Subsumption." in ATLANTIS, 31 (2) : 57-73. |
[14] | Pérez Hernández, L. y Díez Velasco, O. 2004-2005. « Grammatical Metonymy and Metaphor : a case study of Italian morphology », in RESLA 17-18 : 81-95. |
[15] | Pérez Hernández, L. 2002 Towards a Constructional Account of Illocution. Revista de Filología Moderna 3: 149-162 |
[16] | Pérez Hernández, L.2002: Blending versus Conceptual Interaction in the Construction of Illocutionary Meaning: Counterfactual Pieces of advice..Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 15: 181-194 |
[17] | Pérez Hernández, L. 2001 Metaphor-Based Cluster Models and Conceptual Interaction: the Case of 'Time'. Atlantis, 23.2: 65-81 |
[18] | Pérez Hernández, L.2001 The Directive-Commissive Continuum. Miscelánea, 23:77-98 |
[19] | Pérez Hernández, L. 2000 Is 'time' a basic domain? Reduction of abstract domains through metaphor and metonymy. Epos 26: 259-284 |
[20] | Pérez Hernández, L. 1999. Grounding Politeness. Journal of English Studies,1: 209-236. Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de La Rioja. |
[21] | Pérez Hernández, L. 1998/1999. A Cognitive Revision of the Functional Grammar Treatment of Illocution. RESLA, 13: 207-222. |
[22] | Pérez Hernández, L. 1997. FG, Illocution, and Cognition. RESLA, 12: 7-25. |
[23] | Pérez Hernández, L. 1997. A Cognitive Analysis of Paul Bowles's The Sheltering Sky. En Lingüística Cognitiva Aplicada a la Lengua Inglesa y su Literatura. Cuadernos de Filología Inglesa, 6.2: 259-278. Universidad de Murcia. |
[24] | Pérez Hernández, L. 1997. A Linguistic Approach to the Erotism of Lady Chatterley's Lover. Cuadernos de Investigación Filológica, 23-24: 213-231. Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de La Rioja. |
[25] | Pérez Hernández, L. 1997. A Cognitive View of the PMIT Illocutionary Operator. California Linguistic Notes, 25.1: 20-23, 58-59. California: Fullerton. |