Resources for Authors:

1. Why publish with SAP
Here at SAP we are committed to the effective and timely dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed academic research.

Your Rights, Our Responsibility
As an author at SAP, your rights will be protected and ensured that any and all legal information and copyright regulations are addressed. Whether an author is published with SAP or any other publisher, we hold ourselves and our colleagues to the highest standards of ethics, responsibility and legal obligation.

Active Peer Review
All our journals, which are run by a group of experienced professional editors, are subject to an efficient, fair, and constructive peer review process.

Maximum Global Distribution
Our sales and marketing teams will ensure that your article gets the widest exposure possible and our website guarantees visibility, including social bookmarking services, so that your article reaches those people who need to read and cite it.

High Quality, Reliable Rapid Production
Our SAP production teams work together to continuously improve and enhance our services, building issues online and our new, even quicker production workflows. We deliver these innovations without compromising our high quality standards.

2. Author Guidelines

(1) General Information
Language All manuscripts should be written in English -- British or American as long as consistency is observed.

Acknowledgements All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section. Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help, writing assistance, or a department chairperson who provided only general support. Financial and material support should also be acknowledged.

Conflict of interest and funding Authors are responsible for disclosing financial support from the industry or other conflicts of interest that might bias the interpretation of results.

Statistic validity If complicated statistical data are provided, the authors may be requested to submit a statement issued by a certified statistician regarding the validity of methods used.

(2) Manuscript Template
Please click here to download the template.

(3) Guidelines for Paper Preparation
To avoid unnecessary delays in the review process, please consider the following policies carefully before you submit your manuscript. Manuscripts that are not concise or do not conform to the conventions and standards of SAP will be returned to the authors for revision.

How to Prepare a Manuscript:

Although we encourage submissions from around the globe, we require that manuscripts be submitted in English which could help to a broad readership. Please ensure that you include the relevant sections for your manuscript type and make spelling consistent with current editions of either Webster's Dictionary or Oxford English Dictionary.

In general, manuscripts should be divided in to the following sections:
Title page
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
References
Tables
Figures

Title Page
This should include the following, in sequence:

1. A succinct title.
2. Full names and Department Name of Organization, Name of Organization, City, Postcode, Country of all authors.
3. Name of corresponding author (to whom proofs and all correspondence will be sent) together with their Department Name of Organization, Name of Organization, City, Postcode, Country, and e-mail address.

Abstract and Key Words

Abstracts are often the least considered but most important part of any paper. Most readers of a journal will read most of the abstracts, but very few will read the full papers. The following suggestions should help authors to write their abstracts.

Summary the main findings and be concise (300 words maximum).The essential elements of the abstract are:
  •Background: A simple opening sentence or two placing the work in context.
  •Aims: One or two sentences giving the purpose of the work.
  •Method(s): One or two sentences explaining what was done.
  •Results: One or two sentences indicating the main findings.
  •Conclusions: One sentence giving the most important consequence of the work.
A list of 3–10 keywords suitable for indexing should be given below the abstract, each separated by a semicolon (;).

Introduction

The Introduction should be succinct and without subheadings. The Introduction should assume that the reader is knowledgeable in the field and should therefore be as brief as possible but can include a short historical review where desirable.

The Introduction should provide a clear statement of the problem, the relevant literature on the subject, and the proposed approach or solution. The introduction should not be an extensive literature review although it should provide sufficient background information for the reader to understand and evaluate the results of the present study without referring to previous publications on the same topic. It should be understandable to colleagues from a broad range of scientific disciplines.

Methods

The methods section of a research paper provides the information by which a study’s validity is judged. Therefore, it requires a clear and precise description of how an experiment was done, and the rationale for why specific experimental procedures were chosen.

The methods section structure should: describe the materials used in the study, explain how the materials were prepared for the study, describe the research protocol, explain how measurements were made and what calculations were performed, and state which statistical tests were done to analyze the data.

This section should contain sufficient detail so that all experimental procedures can be repeated by others in conjunction with cited references. Procedural detail that has been published previously should be referred to by citation. When a modified procedure is used, only the author’s modifications of the previously published method need to be given in detail. Subheadings should be used.

Results

The description of results should not simply reiterate data that appear in tables and figures and, likewise, the same data should not be displayed in both tables and figures. The results section should be concise and follow a logical sequence. If the paper describes a complex series of experiments, it is permissible to explain the protocol/experimental design before presenting the results. Do not discuss the results or draw any conclusions in this section. This section may be divided into subheadings to assist the reader. The results section should be written in the past tense.

Discussion

The Discussion should accurately interpret the results, but not be repetitive with the Results section. Authors are encouraged to discuss their work in the broader context. Related published data must be appropriately discussed and cited. Speculation is allowed but should be clearly labeled as such.

The Discussion should spell out the major conclusions of the work along with some explanation or speculation on the significance of these conclusions. How do the conclusions affect the existing assumptions and models in the field? How can future research build on these observations? What are the key experiments that must be done? The discussion should be concise and tightly argued. The results and discussion may be combined into one section, if desired.

Conclusions

This should summarize the major conclusions that can be drawn, pointing out their significance, and alluding to possible future directions.

Acknowledgments

These should be brief and should be made only to those who have made a significant contribution to the study.People who contributed to the work but do not fit the criteria for authors should be listed in the Acknowledgments, along with their contributions. You must also ensure that anyone named in the Acknowledgments agrees to being so named.

References

References are numbered consecutively in the order in which they appear in the text. All references must be cited in the text in superscript. Number the reference items consecutively in square brackets (e.g. [1]). When referring to a reference item, please simply use the reference number, as in [2].

Style and punctuation of references illustrated in the following examples:

1. Referencing information for a book: All author names, Book title, Publisher, Country, Year. e.g. Kevin R. Fall, W. Richard Stevens, TCP/IP Illustrated, Volume 1: The Protocols, 2nd ed., Addison-Wesley, USA, 2011.
2. Referencing information for a journal paper: All author names, Title, Publisher, Journal title, Vol, No, pp, Year. e.g. Mayank Suhirid, Kiran B Ladhane, Mahendra Singh, Vishwas A Sawant, "Lateral Load Capacity of Rock Socketed Piers Using Finite Difference Approach", Scientific & Academic Publishing, Journal of Civil Engineering Research, vol.1, no.1, pp.1-8, 2011.
3. Referencing information for a conference paper: All author names, Title, Conference title, pp, Year. e.g. Mohemed Almorsy, John Grundy and Amani S. Ibrahim, "Collaboration-Based Cloud Computing Security Management Framework" , in Proceedings of 2011 IEEE 4th International Conference on Cloud Computing, pp. 364-371, 2011.
4. Referencing information for a webiste:
e.g. Online Available:http://journal.sapub.org/ajb

Figures

Figures should be presented in the order they are mentioned in the text. Figures should be labelled sequentially as Figure 1, Figure 2, etc. Each figure should be saved in a separate file, numbered and titled and cited in the text. The figures should be of high quality, appropriately serve their intended purpose, and have figure legends that adequately explain their meaning. All figures should be clear enough and must be sufficient high-resolution to be photographed by the printer.
Figure legends should be printed, double spaced, on a separate sheet titled ‘Titles and legends to figures’.

Tables

Begin each table on a separate page, double-spaced. All tables must be numbered consecutively (using Arabic numerals) and be cited in the text as Table 1, Table2, etc., and followed by a short, descriptive title. Abbreviations used in the table must be defined in a footnote to the table. Do not use vertical lines and keep horizontal rules to a minimum. All tables should be clear enough and the units are usually in brackets following the quantity, and the font should be Times New Roman and size of 9 pt. Please send the tables in excel.
Please refer to the manuscript template (download the template) for more information of the manuscript format when preparing your papers.

3. Peer review Process

1. Author(s) submit their paper to the editor of our journal.
2. The editor determines whether the article is of sufficient quality and appropriate content. If deemed appropriate, the paper is then sent out for review using a double blind process. (The review of every manuscript is performed by two anonymous reviewers.) On the other hand, if the editor rejects the article, he will inform the author(s) for revising the manuscript and resubmitting to us.
3. The reviewers evaluate the academic quality of the article, aiming to find out any mistakes or weakness and to give suggestions of improving the quality of the whole article. Then they send back the review reports to the editor along with a recommendation whether it is suitable for publication.
4. Editor sends reviewers’ comments to author(s). If neither of the reviewers suggests publication, the editor will send a rejection letter to author(s) and terminates all the process. On the contrary, author(s) should revise the article according to reviewers’ comments.
5. After receiving their revised article, it will proceed to the next process of publication.

4. Publication Processing Fee

Authors are generally required to pay a $300 publication charge. Authors from developing countries will be offered discounts on the publication fee. The authors must pay an additional fee for mailing and printing costs if the journal's hardcopy is needed. It is a flat fee that does not vary based on word count or use of color figures.

5. FAQs

Q1: Can I publish a review or survey paper in SAP?
A1: There are no restrictions on the type of paper that may be published within SAP. Any article submitted that falls within the aims and scope of a journal will be eligible to be published in SAP.
Q2: How much will it cost to publish in SAP?
A2:As our journal is open access to all the readers around the world, we charge the fees for publication to keep operation such as Peer-review, Copyediting, Typesetting and XML mark-up etc. Author publication charges vary depending on the journals in SAP.
The publication is free in some journals. While the publication fee of some journals is USD$300. Authors from developing countries will be offered discounts on the publication fee.
Q3: How long does the review process take?
A3: The papers will be reviewed by two or more independent referees. They may also be read and considered by members of the journal’s editorial board and ultimately by the editor(s) before a decision is rendered. The review result will be sent to you within one month after submission. Do not hesitate to contact us if you would like to know the status of your manuscript.
Q4: How to submit manuscripts to SAP?
A4: Authors should submit their manuscript through our online submission system (http://www.manuscriptsystem.com). Through the online submission, authors can easily check the status of their submission. Papers are easier to track, amend, and update. Submissions sent via email will not be accepted.
Q5: How do I know whether my manuscript submission to SAP worked OK?
A5: You will receive an automatic confirmation e-mail as soon as you have uploaded the manuscript. Your manuscript will then be checked and forwarded to the editors who will start the preliminary review. If there are any problems with your uploaded manuscript you will be contacted by the editors
Q6: Whom do I contact if I have questions about the status of my manuscript?
A6: Please contact us via the email:editor@sapub.org.
Q7: What type of file format do you accept?
A7: At present, Microsoft Word 2003 or higher is the only format for submitting your manuscript.
Q8: Where can I find a template for submission of a paper in SAP?
A8: Template is available on the website: http://www.sapub.org/journal/news.aspx
Q9: How many pages is allowed in any submitted paper?
A9: Submissions should be no less than five pages and should not exceed thirty pages in length.
Q10: Why do I need to sign a copyright form?
A10: It is a legal requirement that we cannot publish any article without receiving a signed copyright form from the author. If we do not receive your signed copyright form, we cannot publish your article.
Q11: How many papers can an author submit and what are the restrictions?
A11: An author can submit any number of different papers for publication consideration. However, you can only submit one paper to one journal at one time. You cannot submit the same paper to more than one journal at the same time for consideration.
Q12: I am an author of an article on SAP and would like a hardcopy of the article. Who do I contact in that regard?
A12: Please contact us with email subscribe.sap@gmail.com in this instance. You can then send your request for a complementary author copy to him/her directly. After getting your post address, our staff will send the post package for the place.

Newsletter

Just enter your email address below,we will share with you the latest information of journals published by SAP. Plus, you can easily unsubscribe at any time, and we'll never share your email address with anyone.


Partners